https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260538 --- Comment #13 from Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> --- >From the kepler git repo https://github.com/sustainable-computing-io/kepler.git ... $ file ./bpfassets/libbpf/bpf.o/amd64_kepler.bpf.o ./bpfassets/libbpf/bpf.o/amd64_kepler.bpf.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, eBPF, version 1 (SYSV), with debug_info, not stripped My question remains - is this built during the rpmbuild process or is it pulled from the tarball? I believe it needs to be built locally as part of the Fedora build each time - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#prebuilt-binaries-or-libraries New question :) - if this is platform-independent eBPF bytecode, why prefix the name with amd64? For people on other arches this is going to be a source of confusion - looking at my aarch64 laptop and my confusion RN for example ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260538 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260538%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
