https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260538 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> --- | The build system will build for all architectures. What I suspect is actually needed here is the intersection of 'all support golang architectures' and 'all supported bpf architectures' (which is not all architectures, it turns out). There's a similar situation in the Grafana build, where we need golang and nodejs architectures only, and this spec file snippet is used there: %global grafana_arches %{lua: go_arches = {} for arch in rpm.expand("%{go_arches}"):gmatch("%S+") do go_arches[arch] = 1 end for arch in rpm.expand("%{nodejs_arches}"):gmatch("%S+") do if go_arches[arch] then print(arch .. " ") end end} However, I'm not aware of a bpf_arches macro - for PCP we are using a local macro defined as: 'x86_64 %{power64} aarch64 s390x'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260538 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260538%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
