[Bug 2257948] Review Request: bpfman - EBPF Program Manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257948



--- Comment #11 from Daniel Mellado <dmellado@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi @fab, I've checked mainly re: implementations of algorithms with some
dedicated folks (thanks @cclang) and it should be fine.

Can we move forward with the bundled version? 

We'll still commit to provide the unbundled and switch to it but as you can see
we're waiting on some packages and iterating on a few others and the list keeps
growing. I'd like to unblock this while keeping the work, is there any issue
from your side? Thanks! Pointing to specifics we're waiting on:

# Updated on bpfman

- netlink-packet-route: packaged for Fedora, but too new (v0.18 vs. v0.17) ->
updated in bpfman, should be ok now
- rtnetlink: packaged for Fedora, but too new (v0.14 vs v0.13)

# Waiting to be updated on Fedora
- comfy-table: packaged for Fedora, just too old (v4 vs. v7)


- aya: cannot be un-bundled, trying to get a new release so we can package it
instead of git
- sled: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259675
  PR open to sled -> https://github.com/spacejam/sled/pull/1500 updates
rand_distr to 0.4.3
  PR open to sled -> https://github.com/spacejam/sled/pull/1501 updates
zerocopyu to 0.7


# These brings a lot of dependencies, with several dependency tree levels and
somehow blocked. Can provide exact details if you'd like to discuss.

- sigstore: not packaged for Fedora
- oci-distribution: not packaged for Fedora (does not look too bad to add it)
- systemd-journal-logger: not packaged for Fedora 

# We discussed about these ones and you mentioned that they'll be tackled later
from rust-sig
- prost / prost-types: packaged for Fedora, but too old (v0.12 vs v0.10)
- tonic: not packaged for Fedora (I *think* we have all its dependencies)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257948

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202257948%23c11
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux