https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260349 --- Comment #5 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4) > Oops, not sure how I could have missed the FIXME. > I've removed the executables (I don't need them) - I only need the library > interface. I tend to like packaging binaries when there aren’t conflicts or other great hardships standing in the way, but I can see why it’s easier for you to drop them, and I suppose they’re only a PR or bug report away, if someone ends up needing them. > I cannot package v0.19 yet, since other capnp* crates in Fedora are stuck at > v0.18 too, and the thing I'm packaging this for also needs v0.18. All capnp* > crates can only be updated to the v0.19 branch together. Makes sense; I suspected that might be the case. > Updated files behind the same URLs. Thanks. Full review to follow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260349 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260349%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
