[Bug 2264493] Review Request: rust-nu - New type of shell

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264493

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Local test build was performed against the results of the other pending (but
already approved) packages.

===

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
o test suite is run and all unit tests pass (some tests skipped with
explanation)
o latest version of the crate is packaged (version matches the version of other
nu-* crates that are already packaged in Fedora)
- license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora
- licenses of statically linked dependencies are correctly taken into account
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
  (should happen automatically)

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

- track package in koschei for all built branches
  (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)

===

Please remove this line from the %files list, we don't build wix installers, so
this file is irrelevant (it's also only a rich-text formatted version of the
MIT license text, so it's also redundant):

> %license wix/License.rtf

PS: Would it make sense to request a nushell equivalent of
%bash_completions_dir / %fish_completions_dir to be added to the filesystem
package? That would allow packages to install nushell completions without
needing to co-own the completions directory.

PPS: Congratulations on getting nushell packaged 🎉


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264493

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202264493%23c2
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux