[Bug 2264463] Review Request: cramjam-cli - Simple CLI to a variety of compression algorithms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264463



--- Comment #16 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #15)
> I preferred the previous approach where you included the Python metadata.
> PyPI is the primary distribution channel, and I don't think including the
> Python package adds _too_ much extra complication. It seems strange to me to
> use the sdist but not build a Python package from it.

Do you like the original approach of having a separate python3-cramjam-cli
package, with a fully-versioned dependency on the base package, to carry the
metadata and the Python interpreter dependency?

Miro and Fabio, what do you think? I’m kind of taking a poll here. I think
either approach (package metadata or don’t) is defensible, and neither approach
is going to burden me too much.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264463

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202264463%23c16
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux