https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263601 --- Comment #7 from Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> --- Hi, Thanks for the very detailed review! FYI: I have opened an upstream PR to fix the make file and tweak the resulting documentation. https://github.com/VectorCamp/vectorscan/pull/231 Per #d, I think the longer term place is probably to replace hyperscan, but not for a release at least. So I wasn't really sure what to do with conflict/obsolete/etc. I forgot about excludearching it because its been building as copr for so long (and some of this is the result of copy/pasting the hyperscan.spec a couple years back and forgetting about it, not bothering to go do a full review again). There is a BZ opened for that. Anyway, I have a another version, but lets see what upstream thinks about the PR before I check in a squashed commit/etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263601 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202263601%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue