https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260793 --- Comment #37 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- As for plasma-workspace-x11, I agree that probably nothing at all should have a Requires: plasma-workspace-x11. Currently, already nothing has that. The only case where I can see it could possibly make sense is if some plasmoid or KCM (either a new one or one split out from the Plasma releases by upstream) specifically only works in an X11 session, but even then we can do without the Requires, or it might even make more sense to just build and ship the component as part of plasma-workspace-x11. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260793 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260793%23c37 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
