https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260793 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I would also like to point out again that, as I have already explained (see comment #10), the Epoch: 1 is absolutely necessary to prevent the package from getting obsoleted again and again each time kwin is updated in Fedora 40 (and the same goes for plasma-workspace) and that, as proven above (see comment #13), it does NOT prevent the Obsoletes from kicking in when upgrading from Fedora 38 or 39 to Fedora 40. So the demand to remove the "Epoch: 1" is unreasonable and impossible to satisfy. As for the Provides: deprecated(), why would it not be up to me as the maintainer to decide whether my package should be deprecated or not? I actively maintain this and see no reason for it to be marked as deprecated. (That said, since this is not going to impact end users, this is at least negotiable. The Epoch is not.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260793 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260793%23c33 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
