https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208398 --- Comment #6 from Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the review! (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #3) > Blocking issue found is the package does not contain License file at all. I've updated the license tag to the best of my understanding. The actual license file is included in /usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info/LICENSE (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #4) > Not sure whether using suffix .py for commands present in path is a good idea. Usually I would expect it not present, but it might be some tools depend on those names or upstream wants them this way. I thought about it but I didn't want to deviate from upstream. Looking at `/usr/bin` on my Fedora box there's quite a few things there with various suffixes (including .py) so I think this is probably fine in practice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208398 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202208398%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
