https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- The window of opportunity is closing for me to get SoPlex and SCIP into Fedora before the Fedora 40 beta freeze. This review has dragged on for 2 months now, not due to any packaging issues, but because of an upstream bug. I would like to propose some courses of action that would let us move forward. 1. I comment out the known-buggy function. The consuming project I care about, papilo, does not use the function in question. We could add a note to %description or to a README noting that the function is unavailable in the Fedora build because of a known bug. 2. We build the upstream code the way it is. If there is any code out there in the wide world that calls that function, it already has to deal with the consequences of the bug. 3. Like #2, but we continue to work on fixing the bug after this package is added to Fedora. Can we do one of those please? The whole SoPlex/SCIP effort is being held up by a bug that will never manifest when they are used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202253356%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
