[Bug 2149430] Review Request: python-syndom - A simple RSS/Atom parser library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430



--- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Oh, sorry, this is my bad, I totally forgot to address the concerns here.

(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #6)
> Yeah I know. It's your call, but my vote is for "syndication-domination" as
> it's more future-proof and easier to find the upstream project. But yes,
> that indeed makes it harder to find the source package from the binary
> package. There's no winning here. :/

Sure, let's rename it to "syndication-domination", fine with me.

I guess this somewhat addresses the other concern wrt the Python library
metadata as well: If we say it's primarily a C++ library, it makes sense to use
the regular, non-Python package naming and also I don't think it then needs to
follow other Python conventions, such as being on PyPi and using pyproject.toml
for building (the current meson build system certainly doesn't need
pyproject.toml and I am not sure it makes sense to add it upstream just for
keeping Fedora buildrequires if it's not used for anything else). What do you
think?

This review request has taken a while (sorry, totally due to me!) and looks
like other distros in the mean time have packaged up this project and have gone
with "syndication-domination" source package name as well, e.g.
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/syndication-domination,
https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/syndication-domination/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202149430%23c12
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux