[Bug 2154514] Review Request: hare - The Hare programming language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514



--- Comment #23 from Mike Rochefort <mroche@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Update: Both qbe[0] and harec[1] merge requests are done and waiting to be
merged.

Hare finally has tagged releases, to both harec and hare are now using
0.24.0-rc1 and are no longer snapshot based (goodbye logic!). In the future,
the harec will be provided as part of the main hare package, so there will need
to be some decisions made at that point how to handle the relationship between
it and the bootstrap harec package. That and working on a hare-rpm-macros
package are topics that would be a good starting place for a Hare SIG.

As for the harex helper, I've decided to scrap it. It adds an extra (long)
variable that just masks setting AS, CC, and LD yourself. Arguably those belong
in a build config at compile time, and exported or prepended in a shell for
interactive compilation.

SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mroche/hare/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06981286-hare/hare.spec
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mroche/hare/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06981286-hare/hare-0.24.0~rc1-1.fc40.src.rpm

Alternative source view: https://pagure.io/mroche-copr-hare/hare

Final notes: the rpkg.conf is required for SCM builds on COPR to retrieve
upstream tarballs; it will be removed if/when the package is approved for
inclusion.

I have yet to do scratch builds on Fedora infra due to the QBE/harec
requirements, but I do have F38, F39, Rawhide, and EPEL9 builds for x86_64 and
aarch64 of all three packages in my COPR. Once the dependencies are fixed, I
can take a look at verifying riscv64 builds.

[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qbe/pull-request/1
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/harec/pull-request/3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202154514%23c23
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux