https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250532 Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? CC| |gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Notes ===== [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. => mrs_tools-1.0.2-1.fc40.noarch.rpm does not contain a license file. I see that it requires python3-nifti-mrs, which has a license file. Personally, I'd err on the side of caution here. Not blocking this review, but rather something to keep in mind. [!]: Latest version is packaged. => Version 1.1.1 was released on December 6, 2023. Please update before importing. => A nitpicky bit: Consider standardizing on BRs. You are using `python3-foo` and `%{py3_dist foo}` intermixed. => Bonus points for handcrafted man pages! ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-nifti-mrs-1.0.2-1.fc40.noarch.rpm mrs_tools-1.0.2-1.fc40.noarch.rpm python-nifti-mrs-doc-1.0.2-1.fc40.noarch.rpm python-nifti-mrs-1.0.2-1.fc40.src.rpm ============================================================================================================================ rpmlint session starts ============================================================================================================================ rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpymt7rc0b')] checks: 31, packages: 4 python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: W: no-documentation ============================================================================================= 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 1.3 s ============================================================================================= Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 mrs_tools.noarch: E: spelling-error ('standardised', '%description -l en_US standardised -> standardized, standardize, standard') mrs_tools.noarch: E: spelling-error ('et', '%description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt') mrs_tools.noarch: E: spelling-error ('al', '%description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al') mrs_tools.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Magn', '%description -l en_US Magn -> Man, Magi, Mann') mrs_tools.noarch: E: spelling-error ('doi', '%description -l en_US doi -> dpi, do, oi') mrs_tools.noarch: E: spelling-error ('mrm', '%description -l en_US mrm -> mm, rm, mam') python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: E: spelling-error ('standardised', '%description -l en_US standardised -> standardized, standardize, standard') python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: E: spelling-error ('et', '%description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt') python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: E: spelling-error ('al', '%description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al') python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Magn', '%description -l en_US Magn -> Man, Magi, Mann') python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: E: spelling-error ('doi', '%description -l en_US doi -> dpi, do, oi') python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: E: spelling-error ('mrm', '%description -l en_US mrm -> mm, rm, mam') python-nifti-mrs-doc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('standardised', '%description -l en_US standardised -> standardized, standardize, standard') python-nifti-mrs-doc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('et', '%description -l en_US et -> ET, wt, rt') python-nifti-mrs-doc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('al', '%description -l en_US al -> AL, la, Al') python-nifti-mrs-doc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Magn', '%description -l en_US Magn -> Man, Magi, Mann') python-nifti-mrs-doc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('doi', '%description -l en_US doi -> dpi, do, oi') python-nifti-mrs-doc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('mrm', '%description -l en_US mrm -> mm, rm, mam') python3-nifti-mrs.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 18 errors, 1 warnings, 15 filtered, 18 badness; has taken 0.4 s => Spelling checks have been re-enabled in latest `rpmlint`. Just ignore! Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/wtclarke/nifti_mrs_tools/archive/1.0.2/nifti_mrs_tools-1.0.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 60d405ca6a48b7deb2124c2089fd8d91700283762a7f566ad13a840cb75f6908 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 00e522356deb8dccdcf4864fe15f46723b57f56ae03c4e39e48920f628dfdf1a diff -r also reports differences Requires -------- python3-nifti-mrs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3.12dist(fslpy) python3.12dist(nibabel) python3.12dist(numpy) mrs_tools (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3-nifti-mrs python-nifti-mrs-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python3-nifti-mrs: python-nifti-mrs python3-nifti-mrs python3.12-nifti-mrs python3.12dist(nifti-mrs) python3dist(nifti-mrs) mrs_tools: mrs_tools python-mrs-tools python3-mrs-tools python3.12-mrs-tools python-nifti-mrs-doc: python-nifti-mrs-doc Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2250532 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Python Disabled plugins: fonts, Perl, Haskell, SugarActivity, C/C++, Java, PHP, R, Ocaml Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250532 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250532%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
