[Bug 2260793] Review Request: kwin-x11 - KDE Window manager with X11 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260793



--- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I can bring up 2 test Coprs so that you can test DNF behavior:

Copr 1 would have:

testobsoletes-x11 1.2.3-1.fc39 with no Epoch and no Obsoletes
testobsoletes-wayland 1.2.3-1.fc39 with no Epoch and no Obsoletes

Copr 2 would have:

testobsoletes-x11 1:1.2.3-1.fc40 (with no Obsoletes)
testobsoletes-wayland 1.2.3-1.fc40 with Obsoletes: testobsoletes-x11 <
1.2.3-1.fc39 (with no Epoch)

Then first install testobsoletes-x11, with or without testobsoletes-wayland
(both should behave the same), from Copr 1, then enable Copr 2 and "dnf
upgrade". The way I remember DNF's behavior, you should end up with
testobsoletes-x11 removed rather than upgraded.

Shall I create those test Coprs?

And if the intent of the KDE SIG is to block this package based on the Epoch
issue only, I can also submit the 2 packages with -X11 suffixes with a capital
X (and with no Obsoletes), e.g., kwin-X11, then they will be considered
completely different packages by RPM and DNF, and the discussion will be moot.
But I do not think this is actually necessary, as explained above.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260793

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260793%23c11
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux