[Bug 2257985] Review Request: mk-configure - A build system on top of bmake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985



--- Comment #17 from Michel Lind <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez from comment #16)
> The project license is in `doc/` itself. Separating that folder into its own
> package would remove that file from the core package. What would be the best
> way to handle that? Just duplicate it?
> 
probably just split out examples then, and not doc. So your project license is
still in the main package

> The `examples/` folder contains many examples, and some have COPYING and
> some don't. There are a total of two COPYINGs file right now, but that could
> grow with the project. How should I handle also this situation best? Just
> mark them all with "%license"?

yeah, just mark all of them. FWIW the two licenses right now are... exactly
identical?

Now, what should the license declaration be for the entire examples subpackage
- the two examples with COPYING are clearly BSD-2-Clause, the rest looks like
trivial programs. from looking at doc/LICENSE I suppose once examples is a
subpackage, the ISC license would move from the main package to the subpackage
(it only applies to examples/hello_strlcpy/strlcpy.c) ...


so main package would be BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-4-Clause -- *not* OR
from LICENSE: 

"Different parts of mk-configure have different copyright holders.
All used licences are listed here."

examples subpackage would be BSD-2-Clause AND ISC

since the examples are installed inside the doc folder of mk-configure, make
the subpackage require the main mk-configure

if you give %license the absolute path rather than a relative path, it will not
move the file - you want to do this for the examples, since they apply to
specific example projects

%license %{_datadir}/mk-configure/examples/autoconf/proj/COPYING
%license %{_datadir}/mk-configure/examples/autotools/proj/COPYING


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202257985%23c17
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux