https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985 --- Comment #17 from Michel Lind <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez from comment #16) > The project license is in `doc/` itself. Separating that folder into its own > package would remove that file from the core package. What would be the best > way to handle that? Just duplicate it? > probably just split out examples then, and not doc. So your project license is still in the main package > The `examples/` folder contains many examples, and some have COPYING and > some don't. There are a total of two COPYINGs file right now, but that could > grow with the project. How should I handle also this situation best? Just > mark them all with "%license"? yeah, just mark all of them. FWIW the two licenses right now are... exactly identical? Now, what should the license declaration be for the entire examples subpackage - the two examples with COPYING are clearly BSD-2-Clause, the rest looks like trivial programs. from looking at doc/LICENSE I suppose once examples is a subpackage, the ISC license would move from the main package to the subpackage (it only applies to examples/hello_strlcpy/strlcpy.c) ... so main package would be BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-4-Clause -- *not* OR from LICENSE: "Different parts of mk-configure have different copyright holders. All used licences are listed here." examples subpackage would be BSD-2-Clause AND ISC since the examples are installed inside the doc folder of mk-configure, make the subpackage require the main mk-configure if you give %license the absolute path rather than a relative path, it will not move the file - you want to do this for the examples, since they apply to specific example projects %license %{_datadir}/mk-configure/examples/autoconf/proj/COPYING %license %{_datadir}/mk-configure/examples/autotools/proj/COPYING -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257985 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202257985%23c17 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue