[Bug 2257948] Review Request: bpfman - EBPF Program Manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257948



--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Taking a look at the missing dependencies:

- aya: appears to require a git snapshot according to the comments in the spec
file, cannot be un-bundled
- comfy-table: packaged for Fedora, just too old (v4 vs. v7)
- netlink-packet-route: packaged for Fedora, but too new (v0.18 vs. v0.17)
- oci-distribution: not packaged for Fedora (does not look too bad to add it)
- prost / prost-types: packaged for Fedora, but too old (v0.12 vs v0.10)
- rtnetlink: packaged for Fedora, but too new (v0.14 vs v0.13)
- sigstore: not packaged for Fedora (does not look too bad to add it)
- sled: not packaged for Fedora (looks like we already have all its
dependencies though)
- systemd-journal-logger: not packaged for Fedora (we already have all its
dependencies)
- tonic: not packaged for Fedora (I *think* we have all its dependencies)

====================

To sum it up, these are missing:

- oci-distribution
- sigstore
- sled
- systemd-journal-logger
- tonic

These are too new in Fedora, you might be able to patch bpfman to use the new
versions or request that this happens upstream:

- netlink-packet-route
- rtnetlink

These are too old in Fedora, I should be able to update them soon in Fedora if
necessary:

- comfy-table
- prost / prost-types

So that would mean (estimated) ~10-15 new packages for missing dependencies,
plus updates for some existing packages.

====================

If you want to get bpfman into Fedora quickly, I do not want to block on
building against vendored dependencies as it is done right now.
However, in that case, I would like to work on getting the missing pieces in so
it could stop using vendored dependences at some point in the future.

What do you think?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257948

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202257948%23c5
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux