https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359 Gwyn Ciesla <gwync@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint is clean naming is OK meets packaging guidelines License related items are all OK Spec is legible, in American English Source hashes match Builds locally and in mock on x86_64, BuildRequires are sound. No locales. Nothing bundled Not relocatable Ownership is good. No duplicates. Permissions are good. Macro usage is good. Contains permissable code. Docs handled approprately. No static libraries. -devel only package. No .la No GUI apps No cross-ownership. All ASCII filenames. No requirement of deprecated packages. Looks great to me! APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202253359%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
