Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427484 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-16 19:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I didn't run rpmlint to see if it dinged the license, but the license in the > spec file (OPL + restrictions) is not allowed in Fedora: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > > For what reason are you using the optional restrictions? All the Red Hat > branding is already protected by trademark. The main goal here is to allow Red Hat writers and developers to use Fedora as their main work environment for documentation. The Red Hat documentation uses the above license. The xml & images in this package is embedded in the books at build time. I thought it easiest to use the same license to avoid licensing conflicts ... some may read that as "not have to talk to lawyers" :D I need a license that allows the xml and images to be used in OPL + Restrictions books. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review