https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244819 Aoife Moloney <amoloney@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(ngompa13@xxxxxxxx | |m) CC| |amoloney@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Neal, >From discussing this with the internal team, the feedback is that the video codecs need to be released 25+ years in order to be included in Fedora and/or RHEL, and the bz's (including rhbz#2244820) and/or github files associated with them are not clear that they meet this criteria. Is there a way you can verify that they do in fact meet this requirement? Thanks, Aoife -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244819 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244819%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
