Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2008-01-16 10:33 EST ------- Thx for your review! About regenerating autotools. It is related to the automake version used (automake-1.9 - we don't have it yet as an alternative). using automake-1.10 it will produce some strange result. So i will probably work with upstream to improve either configure.in or Makefile.am to be automake-1.10 compliant. Until then, patching libtool seems safer to me. About BR/R OpenEXR: you are right. Only libs are checked at configure and no binaries are mentioned nor required for the program to run. I will remove them before import. Patches have been submitted upstream: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1872980&group_id=184265&atid=908566 I will request EPEL branch but this will not make sense to have it for now... (only if we decide to have ilmbase and update OpenEXR to 1.6.x later) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review