https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751 --- Comment #8 from Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- It occurs to me that both this package and another one I was looking at just now (https://github.com/charles-lunarg/vk-bootstrap) have an interesting conundrum. In both cases a "library" is shipped as a header + cpp file, with the explicit goal that the consumer will include and link these directly as part of their build. In the latest iteration of perfetto I ship these in %{_datadir}/%{name}/sdk, but perhaps %{_libdir} would be more appropriate? As while these aren't arched per-se, their consumers would definitely be (and header-only packages are arched, and are probably the closest to this). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255751%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
