https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- I commented on the license issue here: https://github.com/ampl/asl/issues/7. As for the obsoletes, the last successful build of the old asl package was for F34. (There were 2 failed build attempts for F35.) We only support upgrades from at most 2 versions ago, which means that right now, we only support upgrades from F36, which did not have the old asl package. Furthermore, the version of the new asl package (20231111) is higher than the last build of the old package (1.42), which is why I think adding Obsoletes won't actually do anything. Normal RPM version comparisons will trump Obsoletes. If you meant that the old asl package should not be updated to the new one ... well, I don't know how to prevent that. I think I prefer to have this approved now. That way, once the mp package is ready to go, I don't have to try to get in touch with you again, only to find that you are lying on a Mediterranean beach for the next 3 weeks. :-) Thank you for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202253354%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
