[Bug 2253354] Review Request: asl - AMPL Solver Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354



--- Comment #5 from Lyes Saadi <fedora@xxxxxxx> ---
I'm back from testing, this does not seem to be working, it is indeed getting
the obsoleted package upgraded:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lyessaadi/obsoletes-testing/.

I think the policy wasn't meant for packages replacing older packages with the
same name, and that it is simply ambiguously written.

Maybe fedora-obsolete-packages would be the way to go ? Anyway, since that
doesn't seem to be such high stakes, I'm okay with getting this approved
despite this point since it isn't a rename in the way the policy expected it to
be. You can consider that MUST item to be approved.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202253354%23c5
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux