https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255982 --- Comment #6 from loise@xxxxxxx <loise@xxxxxxx> --- Hi Steve, 1. yes, I guess that can be removed. I took over the spec file from kf5-libkdcraw.spec and adapted it and thought I'd leave it there for the first try 2. I'm objecting to remove this part (together with #3) - the stable_kf6 macro doesn't do what it should do, delivering the url to the file to build the srpm file, because it is part of the kf6-rpm-macros rpm that gets loaded only at building the rpms from the srpm. So, 2 is needed as it is (and should be in all files back where it is necessary) to allow building the srpm outside of the fedora cache if it isn't already there or within a local SOURCES cache. %ldconfig_scriptlets - fine with removal if it can go away ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255982 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255982%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
