[Bug 2255786] Review Request: python-argparse-dataclass - Declarative CLIs with argparse and dataclasses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255786



--- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> I guess this boils down to a matter of personal preferences. I quite like just throwing the URL in the spec and maybe a tag and let the forge macros do their magic. If needed, a `-v` or `rpmspec --parse` will let me peek under the hood.

Yes, I agree this is a matter of personal preference. I don’t think there’s an
overwhelming technical argument either for or against the use of the forge
macros in trivial cases like this.

(In reply to Sandro from comment #5)
> Notes
> =====
> 
> [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> 
> => While the package name is correct, it is unfortunate that it clashes with
> `python-argparse`, making this package look like a sub package of the former.

I agree it could be a bit confusing. At least it is in fact an *extension* of
argparse. There’s also no python-argparse in Fedora because argparse is in the
standard library now.

> => This could be your first package using the `-l` flag for
> `%pyproject_save_files`. I know the f38 update is still pending. But it
> should get there before the package is pushed to f38.

I am *very* excited about %pyproject_save_files. I’ve already added it to a
bunch of “my” packages in Rawhide even though it’s not in F38/F39 yet and it
still breaks Zuul.

I’ve been trying to avoid inflicting it on reviewers just yet, but I’ll add it
after import in the rawhide branch.

> Package is APPROVED.

Thank you for the review!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255786

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255786%23c6
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux