Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: slrn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226422 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2008-01-15 23:02 EST ------- Packaging looks ok now. rpmlint gave me slrn.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/slrn-0.9.8.1pl1/changes.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> This must be fixed. You can do this in next release. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/slrnpull 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. slrn-pull.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/slrnpull Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/<package name>. slrn-pull.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/bin/slrnpull news 02750 The file is setgid. Usually this is a packaging bug. If this is a game, then, you should use the proper rpm group, or location. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/slrnpull 02750 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/slrnpull 02750 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/slrnpull/out.going 03777 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. ==> are those needed for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review