Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428549 ------- Additional Comments From geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-15 22:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Interesting that this build for Geoff, because it doesn't build for me. Geoff, > did you do a mock build? Against which version of Fedora did you build? I thought it was clear from my comment but I guess not. It did not build for me in mock, but it did build outside of mock since I already had trac installed. I probably should have pasted the failure from mock. All part of the learning experience. > Wow, this is significantly broken; you can't even use setup.py to create the > tarball without having trac installed. Really suboptimal. It seems that they import the main module in setup.py so they only have to specify the version number in one place. I can see why this is attractive but I would think there is a less irritating way to do it. > I did the checkout as instructed in the spec and the content I get differs. I > think it's important to specify a date or a tag or whatever monotone supports to > ensure that we can get a consistent checkout in the absense of an actual release > tarball. I really don't understand why upstream doesn't seem to have tagged any revisions, bizarre. > On the plus side, it looks like many of the shebang lines are gone in the > checkout I made. Well that's one good thing I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review