[Bug 2254142] Review Request: nodejs-pnpm - Fast, disk space efficient package manager for NodeJS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254142



--- Comment #8 from Łukasz Patron <priv.luk@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Dist tag is present.
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file LICENSE-MIT.txt is not marked as %license
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 18282 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define autorelease(e:s:pb:n)
     %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: pnpm-8.12.0-3.fc40.noarch.rpm
          nodejs-pnpm-8.12.0-3.fc40.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpyv_f9nri')]
checks: 31, packages: 2

pnpm.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/color-support/bin.js 644
/usr/bin/env node
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/mkdirp/bin/cmd.js 644
/usr/bin/env node
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/gyp 644 /bin/sh
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/gyp_main.py 644
/usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/MSVSSettings_test.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/__init__.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/common_test.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/easy_xml_test.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/flock_tool.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/generator/msvs_test.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/generator/ninja_test.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/generator/xcode_test.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/input_test.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/mac_tool.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/pylib/gyp/win_tool.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/test_gyp.py 644
/usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/tools/emacs/run-unit-tests.sh
644 /bin/sh
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/tools/graphviz.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/tools/pretty_gyp.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/tools/pretty_sln.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/tools/pretty_vcproj.py
644 /usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/macOS_Catalina_acid_test.sh
644 /bin/bash
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/node-gyp/update-gyp.py 644
/usr/bin/env python3
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/nopt/bin/nopt.js 644
/usr/bin/env node
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/rimraf/bin.js 644 /usr/bin/env
node
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/semver/bin/semver.js 644
/usr/bin/env node
pnpm.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/which/bin/node-which 644
/usr/bin/env node
pnpm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pnpm
pnpm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pnpx
pnpm.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/strip-ansi/license
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/aggregate-error/license:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/ansi-regex/license:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/clean-stack/license:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/env-paths/license:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/indent-string/license:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/is-fullwidth-code-point/license:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/string-width/license
pnpm.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/wide-align/LICENSE
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/aproba/LICENSE
pnpm.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/cacache/node_modules/brace-expansion/LICENSE
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/brace-expansion/LICENSE
pnpm.noarch: W: files-duplicate
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/yallist/LICENSE
/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/chownr/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/color-support/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/fs-minipass/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/isexe/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/minimatch/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/minipass-collect/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/minipass-flush/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/minipass-pipeline/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/minipass-sized/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/nopt/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/once/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/rimraf/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/semver/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/semver/node_modules/lru-cache/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/tar/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/which/LICENSE:/usr/lib/node_modules_20/pnpm/dist/node_modules/wrappy/LICENSE
pnpm.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/pnpm
../lib/node_modules/pnpm/bin/pnpm.cjs
pnpm.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/pnpx
../lib/node_modules/pnpm/bin/pnpx.cjs
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 27 errors, 9 warnings, 27 badness; has
taken 0.3 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "pnpm".
There are no files to process nor additional arguments.
Nothing to do, aborting.
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0
badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
http://registry.npmjs.org/pnpm/-/pnpm-8.12.0.tgz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
553e4eb0e2a2c9abcb419b3262bdc7aee8ae3c42e2301a1807d44575786160c9
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
553e4eb0e2a2c9abcb419b3262bdc7aee8ae3c42e2301a1807d44575786160c9


Requires
--------
pnpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/node
    /usr/bin/sh
    nodejs(engine)



Provides
--------
pnpm:
    npm(pnpm)
    pnpm



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name
nodejs-pnpm --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Perl, Python, fonts, Java, Ocaml, Haskell, R, SugarActivity,
C/C++, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254142

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202254142%23c8
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux