Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2008-01-15 09:41 EST ------- Thx for your advice Ralf: Actually the only difference between ppc and x86_64 (for example and expect for the pkgconfig path for libdir is: ---------------- diff -uNr usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h --- usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h 2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100 +++ usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h 2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100 @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ /* Define to 1 if your processor stores words with the most significant byte first (like Motorola and SPARC, unlike Intel and VAX). */ -#define WORDS_BIGENDIAN 1 +/* #undef WORDS_BIGENDIAN */ /* define if the vsnprintf function is mangled */ /* #undef vsnprintf */ ---------- But this define isn't used elsewhere than in etl_profile.h. If we can consider this as a noach package, then we might need to rip out these lines... Instead of using ETL-config, i was think about having this: (see attachement) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review