https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247275 --- Comment #9 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Upstream released flexparser 0.2, so I: - Switched from a GitHub archive to the PyPI sdist; this means I can’t package the examples (so there is no longer a -doc subpackage), but that isn’t terribly important. At the same time, it means I don’t have to fiddle with SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION, and the entire package is simplified. - Removed the comment about licenses in %files (but it still applies, in that %{pyproject_files} does correctly handle the license files). New Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20231127/python-flexparser.spec New SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20231127/python-flexparser-0.2-1.fc39.src.rpm This no longer works correctly with https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pint/pull-request/10 due to API compatibilities, but it should work once pint 0.23 is released, and we should be able to make the PR work by temporarily bundling the required flexparser snapshot for pint 0.22 until then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247275 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247275%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
