https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250700 --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #2) > Looks good. My only query is about the extras packages---they're all arched > and I don't supposed there's a way of making them noarch? It doesn't really > matter, just that rpmlint picks up the lack of binaries in them. I think that there is no way of doing this for an arched base package other than defining them manually without the assistance of %pyproject_extras_subpackage. I’ve sometimes found that necessary in order to do unusual things like adding upgrade paths for old subpackages, but it doesn’t seem worth it just for making them noarch. This limitation is alluded to from a different perspective in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_extras_macros: > Due to technical limitations, the macro never generates requirements on the arched BASE_PACKAGE%{?_isa} = %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release}. It only adds Requires: BASE_PACKAGE = %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release}) because a macro cannot reliably detect if the subpackage is arched or not. So far, this has not been a problem in practice. However, the fact that the base package is arched is copied from another package I used as a template, and it’s probably unnecessary for this package. Certainly, the comment about endian-dependent test failures is not accurate for this package. Try this: New Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20231121/python-bioread.spec New SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20231121/python-bioread-3.0.1-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250700 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250700%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
