https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158000 --- Comment #46 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- License tag should now contain licenses in SPDX format. License: GPL-3.0-only should be used. I don't think it is correct to modify permissions of file not even owned by the package. %_sysconfdir/%name is not part of the package. I think it is good to provide at least basic commented out configuration to modify. But anyway, this project seems to be abandoned by upstream already: https://github.com/perkele1989/light Does it still make sense to include it into Fedora? If there are actively maintained alternatives, they should be used instead. Consider closing this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158000 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202158000%23c46 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
