https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514 --- Comment #14 from Mike Rochefort <mroche@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > I solved the cross-compiling configuration and dependencies with Lua macros I have this fixed in my unpushed spec, but not using Lua. I don't think cross-compiling toolchains need to be installed by default or even as a recommends, so I have an optional -cross-compile-gnu subpackage that requires binutils and gcc for the correct non-native architectures. The reason for the -gnu suffix is in the even that it is possible to use the llvm and clang utilities as a runtime override, then I'm giving it space to have a -cross-compile-llvm subpackage without needing to do any provides/obsoletes. The config itself is still dynamically generated rather than having multiple architecture configs to select from, but it produces the correct output now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202154514%23c14 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
