https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514 --- Comment #7 from Mike Rochefort <mroche@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > The <ARCH>_AS, <ARCH>_CC, and <ARCH>_LD are used for cross compilation Ah, that makes a lot more sense. Thanks for the pointers there, I'll make those corrections. > I would add best-effort support for riscv64 to the package as well for the sake of the Fedora RISCV project. As I haven't been playing super close attention, do you know if we have native riscv64 builders available for COPR builds? I can always kick off a scratch build, but it's nice to have things hosted somewhere as well for easy user testing. > You don't need the `%global elbuild` thing. Just run `%set_build_flags` unconditionally. I was doing that initially but seeing the double output on Fedora builds was irking me 😆 If I'm the only one, I can set it back to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154514 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202154514%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
