Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-01-14 17:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > I don't think it will, since the xdvi in rawhide is at version 22.84.12-8.fc9, > so rawhide users will just see an updated package. Did I miss something? Maybe. But I recall strange things happening with real package names always winning against versioned virtual provides, even when the virtual provides is higher. Anyway, I have tested that without obsoletes, rpm -Uvh xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.i386.rpm doesn't uninstall xdvi and therefore doesn't proceeds because of conflicts. So I guess that the Obsoletes is needed, and I think that Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12 is the cleanest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review