Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-01-14 17:14 EST ------- A first note is that it seems to me that 22.84.12 should be obsoleted (if xdvi is). The issue I see is that the xdvi package exists and it is a different upstream. However I can't see a reason why somebody would want to package it. In fact it may have been unfortunate that I (I think it was me in a patch fro texlive.spec) called it xdvi and not xdvik. However it is not that obvious since it certainly makes sense to have yum install xdvi installs xdvik. Maybe one possibility could be to drop completely the Obsoletes: xdvi and leave Provides: xdvi = %{version}-%{release} This will hurt the rawhide texlive users but maybe it would be better. Another possiblity could be Obsoloetes: xdvi = 22.84.12 That way the xdvi in rawhide is obsoleted without much side-effect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review