https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249479 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-rpmautospec-core/2/python-rpmautospec-core.spec SRPM URL: https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-rpmautospec-core/2/python-rpmautospec-core-0.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm This fixes one of the two issues… (In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #1) > Two minor issues, see below: … > Issues: > ======= > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > for the package is included in %license. > Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text This is because poetry doesn’t let us mark license files as such in the Python package metadata, therefore the %pyproject_save_files won’t tag them with %license. I’ve added a workaround. > - Specfile is 0600 permissions, should be 0644. This is a bug in rpmautospec (ironically) which is fixed in the repo but not yet released (which I wanted to do for a while but always got distracted). The unprocessed spec file has 0644. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249479 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202249479%23c3 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
