https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249060 --- Comment #4 from Jan Staněk <jstanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #3) > Issues: > ======= > - This package either needs to depend on nodejs or it needs to own > `%{nodejs_sitelib}` in %files. Otherwise, this package won't be installable. Correction – the package would be installable (tested with nodejs-cjs-module-lexer, where I also missed this), but the `%{nodejs_sitelib}` would not be removed on uninstall, instead being kept empty on the system. I'm letting the packages to (co-)own the directory; I really do not wish to tangle the dependencies more (nodejs will depend on them). > - The patch we're carrying needs to have a comment pointing to the upstream > proposal. Added link to the spec file. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jstanek/nodejs-undici/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06632093-nodejs-undici/nodejs-undici.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jstanek/nodejs-undici/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06632093-nodejs-undici/nodejs-undici-5.27.2-3.fc40.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249060 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202249060%23c4 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
