Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 mnagy@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(mnagy@xxxxxxxxxx) | ------- Additional Comments From mnagy@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-14 10:41 EST ------- Updated in CVS. rpmlint now gives me: iputils.i686: E: setuid-binary /bin/ping6 root 04755 iputils.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping6 04755 iputils.i686: E: setuid-binary /bin/ping root 04755 iputils.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping 04755 - these are okay, we need root privileges iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath /bin/tracepath iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/ping6 /bin/ping6 iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/arping /sbin/arping iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath6 /bin/tracepath6 - won't fix, because if i would change these to relative it would be dangerous iputils.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name rdisc - this is alright (this package is a collection of utilities, which rdisc is part of) I also changed the character encoding for RELNOTES to utf8, and few symlinks. I was also talking to Martin Bacovsky (previous maintainer) and he said that he did query upstream for license files, but didn't receive no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review