https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247274 Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I'm wondering, instead of needing a replacement dance, if it would make more sense for this to be a dlopen wrapper on top of Cisco's openh264, sort of like libglvnd does on top of mesa (and/or proprietary implementations), or ocl-icd does on top of several implementations. In other words, as far as everything else is concerned, this would be "the" openh264 and provides headers, link libs, pkgconfig, etc. that ffmpeg, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and mozilla-openh264 (or whatever would provide it going forward) could build against in Fedora, and then Cisco openh264 would provide (just) the actual implementation (when installed). That would probably involve renaming some packages and libraries, but it avoids the need to replace one thing with another (which seems problematic particularly wrt flatpaks, if not in general). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247274 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247274%23c4 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
