https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241961 Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #11 from Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #7) > I have took a look into icons/ folder, and there are a lot of licenses for > icons not contained in license tag. Also their text are not installed with > the package. I don't think that is okay, even though that might create > unusually long list. Especially for uncommon licenses this is a must. > > What is worse some are not present in allowed license list of fedora [1]. It > seems to me licenses not already added need to be approved for inclusion in > Fedora first. > Which might be tiresome process, but I don't think there is a way around. > > List in LICENSES, which does not seems to be allowed: > LicenseRef-CC-BY-SA-3.0-US.txt > LicenseRef-LK-Avalon.txt > LicenseRef-Tango-Public-Domain.txt > LicenseRef-wikimedia-Public-Domain.txt > > If those would not be allowed, such content would have to be removed also > from source archives. > > 1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ CC-BY-SA-3.0-US is possibly not in Fedora License Data because of an oversight; it should be submitted for review (if the submitter wishes to go ahead with trying to get this packaged) but would likely be classified as 'allowed-content'. The two public domain LicenseRefs would likely be allowed under the `LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain` umbrella category but would also have to be submitted for review. However, the license contained in `LicenseRef-LK-Avalon.txt` would probably be classified as "not-allowed". So at a minimum to get this packaged in Fedora the content covered by `LicenseRef-LK-Avalon` would have to be removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241961 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202241961%23c11 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
