[Bug 2241961] Review Request: game-data-packager-free - Installer for game data files (Free version)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241961

Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #11 from Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #7)
> I have took a look into icons/ folder, and there are a lot of licenses for
> icons not contained in license tag. Also their text are not installed with
> the package. I don't think that is okay, even though that might create
> unusually long list. Especially for uncommon licenses this is a must.
> 
> What is worse some are not present in allowed license list of fedora [1]. It
> seems to me licenses not already added need to be approved for inclusion in
> Fedora first.
> Which might be tiresome process, but I don't think there is a way around.
> 
> List in LICENSES, which does not seems to be allowed:
> LicenseRef-CC-BY-SA-3.0-US.txt
> LicenseRef-LK-Avalon.txt
> LicenseRef-Tango-Public-Domain.txt
> LicenseRef-wikimedia-Public-Domain.txt
> 
> If those would not be allowed, such content would have to be removed also
> from source archives.
> 
> 1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

CC-BY-SA-3.0-US is possibly not in Fedora License Data because of an oversight;
it should be submitted for review (if the submitter wishes to go ahead with
trying to get this packaged) but would likely be classified as
'allowed-content'. The two public domain LicenseRefs would likely be allowed
under the `LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain` umbrella category but would also
have to be submitted for review. However, the license contained in
`LicenseRef-LK-Avalon.txt` would probably be classified as "not-allowed". So at
a minimum to get this packaged in Fedora the content covered by
`LicenseRef-LK-Avalon` would have to be removed.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241961

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202241961%23c11
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux