https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244404 --- Comment #7 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #6) > Not everybody has great online access. A separate offline docs package is > very helpful. I agree. I provide docs where they are available or can easily be generated without introducing new license requirements or bundled dependencies. But I also feel there must be a balance between dependencies required for the docs and for the package itself. > Not a must item though. > > > Upon import, please change > %doc *.rst examples > to > %doc NEWS.rst README.rst examples > > as Authors.rst is in the dist-info directory. Good point. I will change that before importing. > Approved. Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244404 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244404%23c7 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
