https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149698 --- Comment #10 from Caleb Maclennan <caleb@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hey, upstream SILE and libtexpdf maintainer here. Long term I 100% agree that getting the libtexpdf projects split out into its own project is the goal we want to achieve, but we're not there yet. We already have it as a separate Git repository because we knew we wanted to allow it to be independent, but it really isn't there yet. To date it has no stand-alone releases and the Makefile even makes assumptions about being a submodule of the SILE repository. Until it has it's own releases and fully stand alone build system I would suggest just building with it being installed as part of the SILE package. As soon as it does have it's own tagged releases then a new package could provide the library and the SILE package could be changed to depend on it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149698 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202149698%23c10 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
