[Bug 226072] Merge Review: libXfontcache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: libXfontcache


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226072


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora
            Version|devel                       |rawhide

panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2008-01-13 02:49 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
+ rpmlint output is ok to accept
libXfontcache.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs
libXfontcache.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs
libXfontcache.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-libs
libXfontcache.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-libs
libXfontcache.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-devel
libXfontcache.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-devel
libXfontcache-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel
libXfontcache-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel
+ source match upstream
1adca018aa7bf2d215f20a69c10828ad  libXfontcache-1.0.4.tar.bz2

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags are used correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains contents.
+ no static libraries.
+ xfontcache.pc file present.
+ -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ ldconfig scriptlets are used.
+ Package libXfontcache-1.0.4-4.fc9 =>
  Provides: libXfontcache.so.1
  Requires: libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6 libXfontcache.so.1 libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ Package libXfontcache-devel-1.0.4-4.fc9 =>
  Requires(pre): xorg-x11-filesystem >= 0.99.2-3
Requires: libXfontcache = 1.0.4-4.fc9 libXfontcache.so.1 pkgconfig
xorg-x11-proto-devel
+ Not a GUI app.

APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]