[Bug 2241062] Review Request: blake3 - Official C implementation of the BLAKE3 cryptographic hash function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241062



--- Comment #8 from Christoph Erhardt <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Link to bug report added to `.spec` file.

I'm a bit undecided when it comes to the SONAME topic. Can semantic versioning
even be applied properly when two independent libraries - one in Rust, one in C
- are hosted within the same Git repository? For instance, an
interface-breaking change in the Rust code would have to trigger a new major
version (and thus a new SONAME) even if the C interface remains the same. That
would mean unnecessary extra packaging effort for downstream distributions.

Right now I'm leaning slightly towards the 'increment whenever the ABI breaks'
approach. For a simple cryptographic-hash library such as blake3 I don't expect
frequent interface changes anyway.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241062

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202241062%23c8
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux