https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244510 Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The `Obsoletes: rubygem-faraday < 1.0.1-10` should probably be either `<=` or `< 1.0.1-11`. But in any case, are the Provides/Obsoletes actually needed? In current situation, rubygem-faraday and rubygem-faradary1 are the same. In the future, keep using rubygem-faraday (i.e. Faraday 2) is the preferred situation. If rubygem-faraday1 is needed for some purpose, then it should be pulled in via dependencies such as: `Requires: rubygem(faraday) < 2`. Or am I missing something? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244510 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244510%23c1 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
