https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235078 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(benson_muite@emai | |lplus.org) --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pyahocorasick.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pyahocorasick-2.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm It does not need to be marked as a doc file. d) License is also in /usr/lib64/python3.12/pyahocorasick-2.0.0.dist-info but rpm -qL only gives: /usr/share/licenses/python3-pyahocorasick/LICENSE so marking it as a license is good, but would be better if the license file in dist-info This is normally handled by the macros. > are in the public domain. This is not a valid code license for Fedora. Since when? This was always ok. Thank you for the review. Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pyahocorasick.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pyahocorasick-2.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235078 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202235078%23c2 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
