[Bug 2242838] Review Request: squashfs-tools-ng - A new set of tools and libraries for working with SquashFS images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242838



--- Comment #4 from David Trudgian <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Many thanks for the review. Have amended and updated the spec / src.rpm files:

Spec URL: https://dctrud.fedorapeople.org/squashfs-tools-ng.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dctrud.fedorapeople.org/squashfs-tools-ng-1.2.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

> Issues:
> =======
> - Devel subpackage does not own /usr/include/sqfs

Added a %dir entry.

> - License field does not include licenses of mentioned exceptions. See
> https://github.com/AgentD/squashfs-tools-ng/blob/master/COPYING.md

Added additional SPDX identifiers.

> - Look into rpmlint error:
>   squashfs-tools-ng-static.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo
> /usr/lib64/libsquashfs.a

Not sure how to end up with a static library with debuginfo here, so I removed
the static package.

> - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
>   Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
>   See:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages

Moved unversioned link to -devel package.

> - Dist tag is present. Is there a reason not to use %autorelease macro?

Changes spec to use %autorelease and %autochangelog macros.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242838

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242838%23c4
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux