[Bug 2242859] Review Request: rocm-rpm-macros - ROCm rpm macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242859



--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> So this is more about keeping the install clean.  subpackaging is fine, which is the controlling one ?

Yes of course, they should be separate packages for sure.
I was thinking have rocm-rpm-macros be the controling package, since it's the
name you gave it in github.

> Having a central rocm_release means all of the packages could be updated at the same time without touching every package's spec file.  if we do not want to do that, lets just remove them from the macros.rocm

My gut says it's little value added, as there will always be updates to the
spec file due to fedora rebuilds. Recently I updated packages to 5.7 and had to
flip all the release fields from 2 to 1. We could avoid churn by adding
autorelease to all the spec files, but I think you still need to make a commit
for it to work correctly. I also am a bit concerned that the macro might cause
difficulties with reproducible builds. E.g/ if I explicitly wanted to rebuild
rocblas from 5.6 against 5.7 to debug an issue, it might be less
straightforward having the spec file depend on these macros.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242859

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242859%23c7
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux